f.lapo.it

The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 mesi fa)
1 1
The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

re: The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

re: The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

re: The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

re: The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

1 1
re: The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

Same reasoning I did regarding bad choices regarding what3words… I'd rather stick to 4 words out of 2048 than 3 out of 65536.
@lapo @ryanc Very reasonable for the what3words use case ... but may get tricky as the target keyspace gets larger. Short wordlist for something like passwords turns into 7 or more words to get enough keyspace. And the "humans can keep 5 to 9 things in short-term memory" means that rehearsal of 5 things to try to commit it from short-term to long-term keeps memorization manageable for a greater number of users.
@lapo there's no actual usability research on this, and it makes me kinda mad
re: The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content

being Italian I'm using four random words out of 80k (we got a lot of different verb form obvious to spell), trying to get other people to do the same seems hopeless
The new NIST 800-63B is good movement ... but the real endgame is still elusive, and requires reading a little between the lines:

Sensitive content